Attempts to define rhythm in music have produced much disagreement, partly because rhythm has often been identified with one or more of its constituent, but not wholly separate, elements, such as accent, metre, and tempo. As in the closely related subjects of verse and metre, opinions differ widely, at least among poets and linguists, on the nature and movement of rhythm. Theories requiring “periodicity” as the sine qua non of rhythm are opposed by theories that include in it even nonrecurrent configurations of movement, as in prose or plainchant.
Elements of rhythm
Unlike a painting or a piece of sculpture,
which are compositions in space, a musical work is a composition dependent upon
time. Rhythm is music’s pattern in time. Whatever other elements a given piece
of music may have (e.g., patterns in pitch or timbre), rhythm is the one
indispensable element of all music. Rhythm can exist without melody, as in the
drumbeats of primitive music, but melody cannot exist without rhythm. In music
that has both harmony and melody, the rhythmic structure cannot be separated from
them. Plato’s observation that rhythm is “an order of movement” provides a
convenient analytical starting point.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario